"Terrible, Save your money"
At one time I loved these cigars but something has changed. Out of the bundle 98% of them were packed so tight they would not draw. The few that did were harsh, and bitter. This brand has gone bad and it is a waste of money. I can not believe at one time I raved how good they were.
David in Rochester, NY June 15, 2008
|
"Good Cigar - Bad Wrapper"
I had a fair amount of problems with these wrappers. For some of the Nic. 2000s, I had to throw them out because the wrapper came apart. The construction is fairly high end so sometimes they are salvageable even with wrapper problems. It's a good cigar despite the challenges.
Nightjoe in ID November 22, 2007
|
"hard to believe this is a conn wrapper"
This almost misrolled cigar was cracked, bitter, and burned fast. I hope they will improve in my humidor. The wrapper is dark and the draw is good. All my other conn wrapper cigars are light in color, more natural. The roll is loose and uneven, but the burn was even. Not the best buy for the money.
Lew in Cape Cod August 28, 2007
|
"Fantastic Value!!"
I am on my 6th bundle of the Nicaraguan 2000 Churchill cigars. The wrappers on all of them have been perfect, I have had only 3 cigars out of 120 with a slightly tight draw. All others have been perect with a beautiful mild to medium flavor. This is without a doubt the best bundle cigar I have smoked and it would hold its own against many of the top tier brands. I usually smoke La Gloria Cubana and the Nicaraguan 2000 is very close to it, and certainly is number one in dollar value.
David Vilinsky in New York July 10, 2006
|